LHC upholds CCP’s powers to investigate Mezan Beverages for deceptive marketing

Show-cause notice issued on PepsiCo's complaint alleging Mezan copied 'Sting' packaging for its 'Storm' energy drink

The Lahore High Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Mezan Beverages Pvt. Ltd against a show-cause notice issued by the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) on alleged deceptive marketing practices.

Under section 37(2) of the Act, CCP initiated the enquiry after receiving a complaint from Pepsi Co Inc. 

The complaint stated that Mezan was copying the overall packaging of Pepsi’s energy drink ‘Sting’ for its energy drink ‘Storm’. The subsequent completion of the enquiry report recommended the issuance of a show-cause notice to Mezan Beverages.

Mezan swiftly responded with legal manoeuvres, filing a writ petition against the CCP’s enquiry process and issuing of show-cause notice. 

In August 2021, the Lahore High Court in its order suspended the show-cause notice, therefore, proceedings before the CCP were stalled. 

However, after hearing the parties at length, the Hon’ble LHC held that the Supreme Court of Pakistan in its judgement rendered in ‘CCP v. Dalda Foods Ltd.’, unanimously, upheld the statutory powers of the CCP relating to initiation of enquiries and gathering of information.

It is pertinent to mention here that on the issue of CCP’s jurisdiction vis-à-vis the Tribunal created under the Intellectual Property Organization of Pakistan Act, 2012 (IPO Act), it has been held that both the enactments i.e. the Act and IPO Act have conspicuously distinct in purpose, scope, and mandate. 

The Act relates to competition law, whereas, the IPO Act pertains to intellectual property laws. Each enactment has created a specialized regulatory body and has put in place a self-contained regulatory framework to administer duties and obligations imposed by law. 

The IPO Act consciously excludes the Act from its Schedule and as such, the legislature has intentionally kept the Act beyond the purview of the IPO Act. 

Hence, ‘deceptive marketing practices’ under section 10 of the Act constitute a necessary and essential element of competition law, the jurisdiction of which is vested with the CCP under the Act.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

FBR exceeds FY24 collection target, sespite shortfalls in sales tax, customs...

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) achieved a collection of Rs9.285 trillion during the fiscal year 2023-24, slightly surpassing the revised target of...