The “Too Big For Pakistan” Problem

Four of Pakistan's largest conglomerates find themselves in the awkward position of having too much cash, and not enough places to deploy it in the domestic economy. Outbound FDI should be made easier

In 2008, the year that we now know was likely the peak of this current bout of globalization, the rise of Corporate India was simply unmistakable. Not only was it the darling of the investing world, but Indian companies were seen as finally having arrived on the global stage, with perhaps no acquisition being more prominent than the acquisition of Jaguar and Land Rover – the iconic British automobile brands – by Tata Motors, the Indian automobile manufacturer best known for producing some of the world’s cheapest cars.

India’s economic heft was not just symbolized by how much foreign direct investment it could attract, or how much it could export, but also by what its companies had the capability of buying abroad. In other words, India’s strength was measured not just by how much money it could attract into India, but how much it had the capability of spending outside India.

Needless to say, this is a game that we in Pakistan know we cannot play. Pakistan does not have a local carmaker, let alone one that could buy a global rival. But we do, somewhat surprisingly, have companies that have clearly outgrown their ability to profitably invest in the Pakistani economy.

They are “too big for Pakistan”.

Four conglomerate holding companies fit this bill in Pakistan, in our view: the Fauji Fertilizer Company, Lucky Cement, Engro Holdings, and Fatima Fertilizer.

All four of these currently have more than $250 million in cash on their consolidated balance sheets right now, two of them currently have more than $500 million, and all four have had more than $500 million in cash on their balance sheet at least at some point over the past five years.

 

To read the full article, subscribe and support independent business journalism in Pakistan

The content in this publication is expensive to produce. But unlike other journalistic outfits, business publications have to cover the very organizations that directly give them advertisements. Hence, this large source of revenue, which is the lifeblood of other media houses, is severely compromised on account of Profit’s no-compromise policy when it comes to our reporting. No wonder, Profit has lost multiple ad deals, worth tens of millions of rupees, due to stories that held big businesses to account.

Hence, for our work to continue unfettered, it must be supported by discerning readers who know the value of quality business journalism, not just for the economy but for the society as a whole.

(Already a subscriber? Click here to login)
  • Full Price Subscription Plans

    Not only will you be supporting independent journalism, 25% of the amount from your subscription will be used to subsidise those subscribers who cannot afford the full price of the subscription. As a subscriber you will get full access to exclusive paywalled content, and an ad free reading experience. Yearly full price subscription plans also include a complimentary annual subscription to The Wall Street Journal.

    +

  • Subsidised Subscription Plans

    Pay part of the full subscription price, if you cannot afford to pay all of it, and the rest will be subsidised by a full paying subscriber. As a subscriber you will get access to exclusive paywalled content, and an ad free reading experience.

  • Free Student Subscriptions

    If you are currently a student, you can claim an already-paid-for digital subscription, courtesy

    As a subscriber you will get access to exclusive paywalled content, an ad free reading experience.

     

Farooq Tirmizi
Farooq Tirmizi
The writer was previously, managing editor, Profit Magazine. He can be reached at [email protected]

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Posts