The govt is kicking the wheat deregulation can down the road

Pakistan’s wheat subsidy problem has been feeding commercial banks instead of farmers and end-consumers. Why won’t the government get rid of this behemoth we do not need?

The long awaited process of wheat deregulation in Pakistan seems to be kicking off, but it is happening half-heartedly at best.  

This comes as no surprise, since wheat deregulation was not an idea that came from the government itself, but rather has been mandated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which has been ruthless in its direction to cut down unnecessary spending by the government. However, it seems the government has found a process with the IMF’s instructions. They accept them, try to get away with doing not even the bare minimum but what looks like the bare minimum, getting reprimanded, and then finally acquiescing – sort of.

The IMF has stated clearly that provincial governments would be barred from setting crop prices as part of its $7 billion bailout package, board approval for which Pakistan secured only a few months ago. It is possibly one of the reasons why the Punjab Government has abolished the provincial food department, replacing it with a new autonomous body.

As of now, the government is mostly just mucking about. They are forming a committee here, and a panel there, and trying to get away with handing wheat over to the free market. The reasons for this are purely political. Actually, the government thinks they are political. Somehow all governments in Pakistan, and particularly those in Punjab regardless of political party (but mostly the PML-N) think they will get votes if they can somehow magically control the price of wheat, both for farmers and end consumers. Historically, the kind of subsidies this has created have not been productive. But how exactly did we get here?

 

To read the full article, subscribe and support independent business journalism in Pakistan

The content in this publication is expensive to produce. But unlike other journalistic outfits, business publications have to cover the very organizations that directly give them advertisements. Hence, this large source of revenue, which is the lifeblood of other media houses, is severely compromised on account of Profit’s no-compromise policy when it comes to our reporting. No wonder, Profit has lost multiple ad deals, worth tens of millions of rupees, due to stories that held big businesses to account.

Hence, for our work to continue unfettered, it must be supported by discerning readers who know the value of quality business journalism, not just for the economy but for the society as a whole.

(Already a subscriber? Click here to login)
  • Full Price Subscription Plans

    Not only will you be supporting independent journalism, 25% of the amount from your subscription will be used to subsidise those subscribers who cannot afford the full price of the subscription. As a subscriber you will get full access to exclusive paywalled content, and an ad free reading experience. Yearly full price subscription plans also include a complimentary annual subscription to The Wall Street Journal.

    +

  • Subsidised Subscription Plans

    Pay part of the full subscription price, if you cannot afford to pay all of it, and the rest will be subsidised by a full paying subscriber. As a subscriber you will get access to exclusive paywalled content, and an ad free reading experience.

  • Free Student Subscriptions

    If you are currently a student, you can claim an already-paid-for digital subscription, courtesy

    As a subscriber you will get access to exclusive paywalled content, an ad free reading experience.

     

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Posts